COPY.
Sir,
Viceroy Tan to Consul Mansfield.
C.O. 16557 RECD 27 JUN S
April 25rd., 1899.
522
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of your despatch, incorporating one received from the Governor of Hongkong, in which B. S. states that our views are diametrically opposed with regard to the question of the removal of the Customs, the decision of which rests with the Governments of our respective countries.
I, personally, have no "view" with regard to the question, I only take my stand on the fact that the original Convention does not mention the removal of the Customs. If the Governor of Hongkong is bent upon the removal, he is going back upon the Convention. If B. S. argues that the question must be left to our respective Governments to settle, then the receipt by me, on three occasions, of telegrams from the Tsungli Yamen, all stating that the removal must not take effect, proves that the Chinese
I
2
COPY.
franslation.
Sir,'
Viceroy Tan to Consul Mansfield.
C.O.
16557
RECO
براهیم
REGO 27 JUN S
April 25rd., 1899.
522
I have the honour to acknowledge receipt of
your despatch, incorporating one received from the Governor of
Hongkong, in which B. Sa states that our views are diametrically
opposed with regard to the question of the removal of the Customs,
the decision of which rests with the Governments of our respective
countries.
I, personally, have no "view" with regard to
the question, I only take my stand on the fact that the original
Convention does not mention the removal of the Customs. If the
Governor of Hongkong, is bent upon the removal, he is going back
upon the Convention. If B. S. argues that the question must be
left to our respective Governments to settle, then the receipt ty
me, on three occasions, of telegrams from the Tsungli Yamen, all
stating that the removal must not take effect, proves that the Chinese
}
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.